Portfolio Management Services (PMS) in India have grown from a niche product for the ultra-rich into a ₹30+ lakh crore industry serving 100,000+ HNI investors. With the SEBI minimum at ₹50 lakhs and over 400 registered PMS providers, choosing well matters more than ever.
This guide walks you through what PMS is, who it's actually for, how to evaluate a manager, what fees you'll actually pay, and the common mistakes investors make in their first PMS investment.
What is PMS?
A Portfolio Management Service is a SEBI-regulated investment service where a professional manager builds and manages a stock portfolio in your name. Unlike mutual funds — where you own units of a pool that the AMC controls — in PMS you own the actual stocks in your demat account. The manager has Power of Attorney to buy and sell on your behalf, but the holdings are yours.
This direct ownership creates three differences that matter:
Customisation — your portfolio can exclude sectors or stocks you don't want (ESG concerns, conflict of interest with your employer, etc.)
Tax efficiency — there's no portfolio-level churn tax. When you exit the PMS, your stocks transfer to you; you only pay capital gains on what you actually sell
Transparency — every trade is visible to you in real time
See our full Portfolio Management Services product page →
Who is PMS actually for?
PMS makes sense if all of these are true:
You have ₹50L+ to invest in equity strategies (SEBI minimum)
You already have a diversified mutual fund base (PMS as a complement, not a substitute)
You can stomach 20–30% short-term drawdowns without panic
You have a 5+ year horizon for the strategy to play out
You want concentrated bets by a manager you respect, not broad market exposure
PMS does NOT make sense as your first equity exposure. Start with index funds and flexi-cap mutual funds first. PMS as a 30–50% slice of equity for ₹50L+ investors is the typical structure that works.
Fee structures — the part most decks gloss over
PMS fees come in three flavours:
Fixed fee only — typically 2–2.5% of AUM per year. Simple, predictable, manager paid regardless of performance. Few managers offer this purely.
Performance-only — typically 20% of returns above a hurdle (usually 8–10%) with no fixed fee. Aligned with you, but managers rarely offer this without volume commitment.
Hybrid (most common) — 1–2% fixed + 10–20% performance over a hurdle of 6–10%. The fixed fee keeps the manager paid; the performance fee rewards alpha.
The hybrid structure can look cheap but bite hard. Example: 1.5% fixed + 20% performance over 8% hurdle. If your PMS returns 18% gross, you pay 1.5% fixed + 20% × (18% – 8%) = 1.5% + 2% = 3.5% total. Net return: 14.5%. You give up over a third of the excess return above hurdle.
How to evaluate a PMS manager
Most investors evaluate PMS managers wrong. They look at the last 1–3 year return chart and pick the leader. This is mean-reversion bait — yesterday's chart-topper often becomes tomorrow's laggard, particularly in smaller PMS strategies that ride a single thematic wave.
A better evaluation framework:
Investment process — is there a repeatable framework you can articulate, or is it just "we pick good stocks"?
AUM trajectory — has the strategy's AUM grown steadily (good) or spiked and contracted (bad)?
Drawdown behaviour — how did the strategy perform in 2008, 2018-19, March 2020, and 2022? Compare with Nifty 500.
Key-person risk — does the strategy depend on one PM? What happens if they leave?
Fee transparency — is the fee structure clearly explained without finance jargon, or does it require a lawyer to parse?
Track record length — has the manager managed THIS strategy across at least one full market cycle (5+ years)?
Concentration discipline — does the PMS publish its position sizing rules?
Common mistakes in first PMS investment
After looking at hundreds of HNI portfolios, the same mistakes show up repeatedly:
Picking by last year's chart leader — almost guaranteed to disappoint over 3+ years.
Not reading the disclosure document — fees, conflicts, related-party transactions are all in there.
Adding too many PMSs — owning 5 PMSs is rarely better than owning 2 well-chosen ones; the overlap is enormous in large-cap names.
Treating PMS as your full equity exposure — it should typically be 30–50% of equity, with MFs / index funds as the base.
Ignoring tax implications of high-churn strategies — frequent rebalancing in your PMS = your tax bill.
Bottom line
PMS is a legitimate tool for ₹50L+ equity investors who want personalisation, direct stock ownership, and the chance for alpha. It's not magic — most PMSs underperform their benchmark net of fees over 7+ year periods, so manager selection matters enormously.
If you're considering your first PMS, start with the Auris Wealth AI Wealth Planner — it'll tell you whether PMS makes sense in your situation, or whether you're better off optimising mutual fund selection first.
One five-minute read every Friday.
Practical wealth notes for Indian and global investors.
Col Ashish Bhardwaj
Founder of Auris Wealth. Ex-Indian Army (20 years). NISM-certified Investment Adviser. Writes about wealth management for Indian and global investors.